media
Posted by @christopher on Oct 17 at 10:45 AM
7
Log in to comment.
comment removed by @SmokenHerb
What could have been if only they had HRT 20 years ago
Nooo. You're interpreting this wrong. That's not supposed to be me as a cute nerdy chick this time, but rather that's a legit real chick and your happy life...
...and your son that grows up to look both unfamiliar and familiar at the same time.
Wait you posted 9 different images and you can't comment on each image? Anyone that comments on a single image it goes under all the images posted? What gives?
Correct. The alternative is to have that confusing situation in which the main post has comments, and then the images each also have their own comments going. Facebook does that, I think twitter does something similar too. I'm not a fan of that disjointed approach. One thing that I might consider if having a "reply to photo"/"comment on photo" link will create a special reply post which shows the photo being replied to in the comment. I'd have to do some experiments to see if I can make it look good while not being confusing. There is also the complexity of handling what happens if someone removes a photo after someone comments on it. Not a huge deal, but there is little stuff like that.
It was like my comment "Our first baby. :)" that was referring to the photo of the pregnant woman but linked with the other comments its out of context. In other words my comment doesn't now make a lick of sense.